Why Did So Many At Mercedes-Benz Group AG Keep Silent About The Case Herbert Heinz Horst Leiduck?

LANGLEY (USIntelNews.com) – In the shadows of the corporate scandals that have dominated the news media over the last few years, one of the world’s largest luxury automakers has provided examples of brutality that shine an unflattering light on the company. The Mercedes-Benz Group AG seems to stumble from one crisis to another. The Mercedes-Benz Group Scandal has become one of the strongest Rich TVX News Network´s news stories of the last few years. This has succeeded in bringing the issue to the forefront of public awareness, but what makes truth uncomfortable for Mercedes-Benz Group AG? It is uncomfortable when we ignore it, when we suppress it, when we hide from it. Why did so many at Mercedes-Benz Group keep silent about the case Herbert Heinz Horst Leiduck? Basically, because they got a swift and painful smack to the forehead when they did speak up. In recent decades, the federal government and state governments have passed laws to protect whistle-blowers, but for the Daimler AG whistleblower personally, his decision to blow the whistle on the Daimler AG has forever changed his life. Daimler AG, the former “Wall Street darling”, has been accused to have hidden the truth about the case of Herbert Heinz Horst Leiduck.

A Whole Family Was Destroyed By These Events, According To The Leaked SEC Files

According to the Rich TVX News Network, Herbert Heinz Horst Leiduck was spending four years in prison even though he was innocent. Herbert Heinz Horst Leiduck lost four years of his life, endured severe pain, and suffered with a permanent handicap, but he never regretted holding on to the truth. Herbert Heinz Horst Leiduck was imprisoned because a large German corporation perverted the course of justice by corrupt means, and despite being a wealthy man, Herbert Heinz Horst Leiduck lost everything he had and he died in abject poverty. It was about time to tell the rest of the Mercedes-Benz management board what was going on. A whole family was destroyed by these events, according to the leaked United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)’s documents filed against Daimler AG, (which changed its name to Mercedes-Benz Group AG this year). Has Mercedes-Benz Group become a risky place to work? It would be unfair to brand the Mercedes-Benz Group AG as fundamentally unethical in its business dealings. But do you think the employees of Daimler AG, were told about the case of Herbert Heinz Horst Leiduck? If not, why not? If they had been told about the case of Herbert Heinz Horst Leiduck, what do you think their reaction would have been?

The Apparent Flexibility Of Daimler’s Ethical & Business Culture

Blowing the Daimler AG whistle was a life-altering experience. According to the Rich TVX News Network, taking the first step was the hardest. A more realistic picture of the apparent flexibility of Daimler’s ethical and business culture can be found in the submission, which spans a long history of litigation in Hong Kong (the “Hong Kong Litigation”), dating back nearly three decades and still ongoing, between Daimler, as plaintiff, on the one hand, and Herbert Heinz Horst Leiduck and IRC, a company he controlled, as defendants, during which litigation Daimler has at least twice bribed government officials to obtain favors and tainted “evidence” favorable to Daimler. According to the SEC complaint “Facts Pertaining To The Alleged Violations” of the Daimler AG whistleblower, Daimler AG (“Daimler”), at least twice to the best of the Whistleblower’s knowledge, bribed government officials in Russia and in Monaco to gain an advantage in litigation in Hong Kong against an individual, Mr. Herbert Heinz Horst Leiduck, and his company, Intercontinental Resources Company (“IRC”), in obtaining an injunction against them and trying to prevent them from obtaining damages arising from the improperly obtained injunction. In effect Daimler has perverted the course of justice by corrupt means. Most recently, in 2018, Daimler, through an intermediary with a history of forgery, obtained, through bribery, false documents from Russian tax authorities in an effort to disprove the damages theory of opposing parties in the litigation in Hong Kong. Ironically, the 2018 bribery followed Daimler’s earlier bribe of an investigating magistrate in Monaco in 1994 to provide information that Daimler could use to obtain an injunction against IRC in the same litigation in Hong Kong, which bribery ultimately caused the damages at issue.

It Is Not So Much Blindness As A Kind Of Astigmatism But Inhumanity

According to the SEC file*, these two instances of bribery demonstrate a consistent practice by Daimler of using fraudulent and corrupt means to manipulate and obtain tainted evidence and strongly suggest an organizational propensity to corruption. Accordingly, the Whistleblower submitted the whistleblower petition to alert the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”) to, inter alia, Daimler’s violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-1, et seq. (“FCPA”), which are all the more egregious given its previous settlement with both the Commission and the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) in 2010 in which Daimler and several of its subsidiaries admitted significant FCPA violations resulting from multiple instances of bribery. There is an ultimate stupidity about most arrogant managerial classes, even when they happen to be highly intelligent; they are a disturbing example of what our experts call “a certain blindness in human beings”. With people involved in the Daimler AG scandal and the case of Herbert Heinz Horst Leiduck, it is not so much blindness as a kind of astigmatism but inhumanity. They want the world to see them as respectable and honorable, but there is an element of spitefulness that they somehow feel they ‘deserve’ to indulge.

*Disclaimer: The views expressed in the whistleblower documents are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of U.S. Intelligence News, or its management. All the charges are accusations of the whistleblower, according to the SEC Complaint documents, and all defendants are presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.