Top Tag

STUDY: Wolf Blitzer's Show Is Weeklong Promo for Dem Investigations…

STUDY: CNN’s 'The Situation Room' Is a Weeklong Promo for Dem Investigations

CNN’s Wolf Blitzer has spent the past week using his evening show The Situation Room as a platform for Democratic lawmakers to plug their numerous investigations of President Trump. Blitzer, a veteran reporter and host on the network, is not a name that immediately springs to mind when one thinks of biased or outlandish statements from CNN journalists. However, the many interviews he has conducted with politicians on the Hill — a staple of his show — tell a story of bias through careful and deliberate framing of facts.

MRC analysts looked at the 10 interviews Blitzer conducted with lawmakers (all Democrats) on his show during the week spanning Monday, March 3 to Friday, March 8. Throughout those ten interviews, the CNN host asked only three questions (3%) that suggested the numerous House investigations into the President might be partisan or politically motivated. The remaining 86 investigation-related questions (97%) either accepted at face value the importance of these inquiries, or else pressed Democrats to go even further in their oversight role.

Blitzer framed his paltry three challenges to Democrats as party-line criticism coming from Republicans (“as Republican are alleging…”, “Republicans say…”). In each case he asked no follow-up questions regardless of what answer he received.

At times, Blitzer pressured his guests to be more aggressive in their investigation of President Trump. For example, on Tuesday, March 4, the CNN host prodded Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN): “The White House is indicating they are not in any mood to cooperate with your investigation. Why haven’t you issued subpoenas?”

Later that same evening he further pressed the same issue with California Democrat Harley Rouda: “You haven’t issued subpoenas yet? You’re waiting? Why not issue subpoenas right away?”

Blitzer also fixated on the issue of impeachment, with each guest getting at least one question about whether they planned to impeach the President. Other questions resembled little more than open-ended prompts for his guests to pontificate about the President’s various misdeeds:

“President Trump may have actually tried to — wanted to pressure the Justice Department to file a suit challenging the acquisition of Time Warner… From your perspective, is that an abuse of power?”’
Question for Rep. Madeleine Dean (D-PA), Monday, March 3.

“Do you believe the President’s legal team was dangling a pardon in an attempt to obstruct justice in the Cohen investigation?”
Question for Rep. Denny Heck (D-WA), Thursday, March 6.

“Manafort is facing up to potentially 25 years in prison. Manafort as the Trump campaign chairman. How will this reflect on the President?”
Question for Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA), Thursday, March 6.

The video below highlights Blitzer’s biased and leading questions for lawmakers (both Democrats and Republicans) over the past few months:

Please support NewsBusters today! [a 501(c)(3) non-profit production of the Media Research Center]

Or, book travel through MRC’s Travel Discounts Program!
MRC receives a rebate for each booking when you use our special codes.


Duterte Warns Women Against 'Stupid' Priests With 'God-Given' Penises…

Duterte Warns Women Against ‘Stupid’ Priests With ‘God-Given’ Penises

Filipino President Rodrigo Duterte advised women against approaching priests in church warning that they can’t resist the call of basic human nature during a speech on 8 March. Duterte alleged that once a priest smells the “scent of [woman’s] body” and corners her in the church, he will inevitably “court” this woman “because he is a man”.

“God gave him a penis. What will they do with that? Will they slap it against the door every morning?” the president said.

Duterte also called all priests “stupid” noting that a smart man would never enter the priesthood because then he will be forced to “keep on looking at all the beautiful women that [he] can’t court”.

The leftist Filipino Gabriela Women’s Party has slammed his statements wondering, “why would women take advice from a self-confessed womanizer and serial misogynist?”

“The macho-fascist president would be the last person who could give decent advice on how women can stay away from or fight abuse”, the party statement said.

This is not the first time the Filipino president has gone after the Catholic Church accusing its clergymen of raping nuns and molesting young boys, labelling the clerics “sons of b***hes”. He also suggested that the church, which he called “the most hypocritical institution”, might go extinct in just 25 years over such problems.


Mexico's leftist president creates new style of govt…

Mexico's leftist president creates new style of government

MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador’s first 100 days in office have combined a compulsive shedding of presidential trappings with a dizzying array of policy initiatives, and a series of missteps haven’t even dented his soaring approval ratings.

Lopez Obrador has answered more questions from the press, flown in more economy-class flights, posed for more selfies with admiring citizens and visited more genuinely risky areas with little or no security than several combined decades of his predecessors. He’s also surprised many by maintaining a cordial relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump, helping contain Central American migrant caravans while resisting U.S. efforts to oust the leftist government of Venezuela.

The folksy perennial candidate took office Dec. 1 and by the end of his first month in office, Lopez Obrador’s approval rating surpassed 80 percent. He has taken full advantage of that mandate to move quickly on many fronts — perhaps too many.

“Every week he announces at least one or two things,” said Ivonne Acuna Murillo, a professor of political science at the Iberoamerican University in Mexico City. “Sometimes the speed of the issues he is putting on the agenda is such that an issue they put out in the morning is displaced by another in the afternoon.”

Before Lopez Obrador had even taken office he held a referendum on the partially constructed $13 billion Mexico City airport. He used the resulting vote as a green light to cancel a project he had campaigned against.

During his first month in office, Lopez Obrador launched a military assault on the country’s fuel theft gangs, dividing the security of Mexico’s critical pipelines and refineries between the army and the navy. The hastily planned offensive created gas shortages across the country, but somehow didn’t dampen his popularity.

This month, he overrode complaints by human rights campaigners and got the Congress and state legislatures to approve constitutional reforms creating a heavily militarized National Guard that he touts as the key to getting control of Mexico’s runaway violence.

A typical day starts with his 6 a.m. Cabinet meeting, focusing on security, where he gets the daily crime report. At 7 a.m., he steps on the dais at the centuries-old National Palace to start a free-wheeling, open-ended press conference that often goes for 1 ½ hours.

From there he might hold a meeting on the initiative of the day, and then around noon he flies off — tourist class, fielding hugs and taking selfies with fellow passengers — to some provincial city, where he’ll meet with local leaders, eat at some modest local cafeteria, then hold another open-air rally and take some more hugs. Then he’ll catch another tourist-class flight to Mexico City. (He says he gets to bed early).

The part of the day he most clearly enjoys? Pressing the flesh and handing out time-tested one-liners at rallies in provincial towns — essentially, the same thing he has been doing for the last 20 years on the campaign trail as a three-time presidential contender.

“He is a bit messianic, meaning evangelical. He’s out there preaching all the time,” said Federico Estevez, a political science professor at the Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico. “He’s Bernie Sanders with power.”

“I’m not sure if this a good governance model, but it’s an exceptionally good political one,” Estevez said.

It’s easy to lose sight of how different this all is, unless you’ve lived through decades of Mexico’s distant, imperial presidency, in which the president seldom appeared beyond orchestrated speeches, or as a motorcade of luxury vehicles speeded to the president’s personal airplane hangar for flights aboard the presidential jet to carefully guarded events.

Gone are the motorcades, gone is the jet, gone is the security, gone is the official presidential residence. You’re more likely to see Lopez Obrador buying himself a $1 styrofoam cup of coffee at a convenience store or eating beans at a roadside restaurant, than to see him rubbing elbows with foreign dignitaries.

Lopez Obrador rode a wave of popular discontent with corruption in Mexico, and has attracted a near-unquestioning devotion because of his own honest, rumpled style.

“The advantage that Andres Manuel has as leader is that he arrived with a backing that no president has had in Mexico,” said Benjamin Arditi, a political science professor at the National Autonomous University of Mexico.

Lopez Obrador has already had spats with NGOs, regulators, environmentalists, outside experts and ratings agencies. His campaign against crime and violence has yielded few results. He chafes at those who ask for feasibility or environmental impact studies for his pet projects.

But hardly anyone notices. “There is a devotion, something almost religious,” said Jose Antonio Crespo, a political analyst at Mexico’s Center for Economic Research and Training. “It makes people believe only what he says, against everything that experts or ratings agencies or international organizations say. They don’t matter, it only matters what he says.”

At least two ratings agencies have downgraded their outlook on Mexico’s debt to ‘negative’ since he took office. His decisions — like the one to cancel the airport project, “don’t generate the slightest bit of confidence,” Crespo said, “and that is going to have a cost, is having a cost, in terms of capital leaving, or money not being invested.”

For Lopez Obrador, Mexico’s foreign policy boils down to simply non-intervention, and he leaves the field to his top diplomat, Marcelo Ebrard.

But some critics say Mexico is doing Trump’s bidding by accepting the U.S. “remain in Mexico” program and by restricting the movement of caravans of Central American migrants. “Remain in Mexico” makes Central American asylum applicants await resolution of their cases from the Mexican side of the border.

“It is a U.S. policy that once again subordinates Mexico’s immigration policy,” said Oscar Misael Hernandez, an immigration researcher at the College of the Northern Border in Matamoros.

Others saw it as a pragmatic calculation that U.S. courts will soon put a halt to the program. Allowing it in the meantime helps U.S. relations and helped Mexico win a $10.6 billion U.S. commitment for regional development, meant to create jobs in Central America and southern Mexico so fewer people feel compelled to leave.

With growing signs of anti-migrant sentiment in Mexico, containing migration costs Lopez Obrador little in political terms, and is balanced by his push to grant work visas for migrants.

The new administration’s most widely criticized misstep was Lopez Obrador’s decision to axe funds for nonprofits working on issues ranging from promoting art and culture to providing domestic abuse shelters, arguing the “intermediaries” were too often used to siphon away government funds. Lopez Obrador wants to give the money directly to the people who needed it, but experts say that won’t work for complex social services like day care and shelters for battered women.

Mariana Banos, whose Fundacion Origen offers support services to women — often through partnerships with other organizations and local governments — said many groups will have to shut down because they depend entirely on government funding.

She scoffed at the corruption allegations and urged the government to reconsider.

“You have to work hand-in-hand, not create a divide, not stigmatize,” she said.

Despite the frictions there are lighter moments to “The 4-T,” a play on Lopez Obrador’s description of his administration as the “fourth transformation” of Mexico.

Lopez Obrador sometimes laughs at his own jokes. He posts Facebook videos from roadside restaurants, with impromptu lectures on the health benefits of coconuts or local fruits. And Mexicans crack up at his frequent, folksy catch phrases like “Me canso ganso,” equivalent to “I’ll be a monkey’s uncle.”

Enterprising designers have come up with a web app that allows people to make resolutions and receive a text message from an AMLO-bot saying “Monica, you’ll lose weight this year, or I’ll be a monkey’s uncle.”


How Facebook, Twitter and YouTube failed to keep gruesome mosque shooting video from going viral

“I will carry out an attack against the invaders, and will even live stream the attack via Facebook.”

That’s what Brenton Tarrant posted on fringe message board 8Chan moments before he allegedly massacred at least 49 people in shootings at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand on Friday.

Tarrant was true to his word and using a GoPro camera strapped to his head, he gave anyone watching on his Facebook page a first-person view of the gruesome murder of people at Friday prayers at the Masjid Al Noor mosque.

The stream showed Tarrant driving to the mosque, getting rifles out of his car, and then appearing to enter the mosque and shoot victims indiscriminately, before getting back in his car and driving to the Linwood Islamic Centre. After 17 minutes of broadcasting to the world, Facebook finally pulled the plug.

But it wasn’t Facebook’s much-vaunted artificial intelligence systems that flagged the content, or the company’s human moderators. It took a phone call from the New Zealand police to alert the world’s biggest social network to the live murders being broadcast on their platform, Facebook confirmed.

Read on Motherboard: Documents Show How Facebook Moderates Terrorism on Livestreams

In the hours after the massacre played out on Facebook, the video was copied and re-uploaded hundreds of times to Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter. The tech giants say they are working hard to stop the video being shared, but it is still easily searchable on all platforms more than 12 hours after the initial attack.

Critics say the massacre is the latest failure of tech platforms to deal with the spread of extremist content on their networks.

“It is not actually difficult once you identify a video, you can hash it, and you can prevent any video from being re-uploaded and disseminated online. It rings hollow, I don’t believe them, I don’t believe that they are really making an effort to remove this horrific content,” Lucinda Creighton, a senior adviser at the Counter Extremism Project, an international policy organization, told VICE News.

“Twitter has rigorous processes and a dedicated team in place for managing exigent and emergency situations such as this,” the company told VICE News. But, searching one of the most popular hashtags related to the shooting, just before publication returned results with a copy of the video right at the top.

Google said “shocking, violent and graphic content has no place on our platforms, and is removed as soon as we become aware of it.”

But on YouTube, a copy of the full video was on the first page of results after searching for a generic shooting-related term. While VICE News was unable to find videos hosted directly on Facebook, there were numerous links to YouTube promising unedited clips of the video.

Facebook failed to respond immediately to requests for comment.

Facebook has previously said that it removes 99 percent of terroris content on its platform automatically, but experts say that artificial intelligence is a decade away from being proficient in dealing with this type of content.

Crieghton says Facebook’s boasting about statistics is meaningless when you consider the huge amount of terrorist content being shared online.

“This is complete fiction from Facebook, it is the typical Facebook massaging of fact and frankly I don’t believe them. They are not transparent, they are not telling us what they are removing, what the criteria are, it is just so opaque,” Creighton said.

There are several new pieces of legislation moving through the European parliament designed to punish tech companies for failing to remove terrorist content on their platforms, but with EU elections approaching, it’s unclear if they will be implemented any time soon.

Tarrant leveraged multiple online platforms to plan and promote his attack prior to carrying it out. He posted pictures of the guns used in his attack on his Twitter account Wednesday and posted his manifesto — describing the attack — on his Facebook and Twitter accounts.

But Ben Nimmo, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, says that it would have been virtually impossible to read the digital signs ahead of the attack — and Tarrant’s social media posts were designed to be read after he conducted the operation.

“He was thinking he doesn’t want to give himself away too much [with his social media posts] but it looks like this was set up so people would read it afterward,” Nimmo told VICE News. “That Twitter account is almost like the footnotes to his operation.”

The manifesto also shows Tarrant was well-versed in far-right ideology and online memes. He says he learned everything on the internet: “You will not find the truth anywhere else.”

But many experts warn not to sensationalize the content of Tarrant’s diatribe, saying it was designed to troll media organizations.

“It’s bait for journalists who don’t know how memetic culture and racism are intertwined,” Joan Donovan, director of the Technology and Social Change Research Project at Harvard Kennedy’s Shorenstein Center, told VICE News. “Journalists are left with enough clues to want to decode it and they shouldn’t. It’s racist garbage that doesn’t point to any significant insights.”

“The motive is clear here: bigoted xenophobic racist religious intolerance,” she said.

Cover image: Members of the public react in front of the Masjd Al Noor Mosque as they fear for their relatives on March 15, 2019 in Christchurch, New Zealand. (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

Petitions of the week

This week we highlight petitions pending before the Supreme Court that address, among other things, whether the time limit for seeking review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit under 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) can be extended, the constitutional limitation on venue selection in a criminal trial, and whether a federal court must grant a motion for a judgment of acquittal when the evidence is in equipoise.

The petitions of the week are:

18-1061

Issues: (1) Whether the 60-day period for seeking review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit under 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) sets a jurisdictional bar, as the panel majority held, or prescribes a claim-processing rule subject to exceptions such as forfeiture, as the dissenting judges below maintained; and (2) whether the government forfeited its timeliness defense.

18-1049

Issues: (1) Whether a federal court must grant a motion for judgment of acquittal when, construing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, evidence of guilt and innocence is evenly balanced; and (2) whether a conviction for mail or wire fraud must be vacated when it is based on claims for benefits under an ambiguous regulatory scheme and the defendant acted consistently with an objectively reasonable interpretation of that scheme.

18-1052

Issues: (1) Whether the Constitution limits venue in criminal trials to those places where the defendant could reasonably foresee that an overt act would occur; and (2) whether 18 U.S.C. § 3237(a) limits venue in criminal trials involving continuing offenses to those places where the defendant could reasonably foresee that an overt act would occur.

The post Petitions of the week appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

Home Ethos About Contact
Terms Policy GDPR RichTVX
© Saeculum XXI U.S. Intelligence News