Silkior
Top Tag

<i>The Act</i> Illuminates a Lethal Bond

Dee Dee Blanchard—who gave birth to her daughter, Gypsy Rose, on July 27, 1991—could not abide by the traditions of child-rearing. She rejected the most common narrative of parenthood, wherein her child would gain independence through friendships and secrets and disobedience; gradually mature into an autonomous adult; and, one day, leave home to make a life according to her own desires and choices.

As Gypsy grew up, Dee Dee trapped her in a tangle of bogus diagnoses: She was confined to a wheelchair due to purported quadriplegia, even though she knew she could walk; a feeding tube was plugged into her abdomen; and she was dosed with unnecessary medications. Dee Dee had even lied about Gypsy’s age, so that years after Gypsy became a legal adult, Dee Dee still wielded authority over her medical treatments, and much else. Gypsy, who eventually realized the fraud to which she was an unwilling party, and the lengths to which her mother would go to render her submissive, began to rebel. Seeking refuge online, she met a guy on a Christian dating site, Nick Godejohn, and the two dove headlong into a vehement, fantasy-addled romance. Soon she asked Nick to murder Dee Dee, which he did. Both he and Gypsy are now in prison.

A story like this, thoroughly macabre and seemingly impossible, summons infinitely more questions than it answers, and has accordingly garnered feverish attention. Dee Dee and Gypsy Blanchard were the focus of a 2016 investigative article by Michelle Dean and a 2017 HBO documentary, Mommy Dead and Dearest, and the new Hulu drama series, The Act, co-created by Dean and Nick Antosca, is based on their story. The series does not dwell on the murder, but instead imagines the everyday life that mother and daughter shared—the lies that Dee Dee wove around them, shielding them from speculation and reinforcing Gypsy’s own belief that her mother was, indeed, her guardian angel. Antosca has told Variety in an interview that for him and Dean “the act” in question is not the murder, as one might assume, but rather “the deception.”

With her article, Dean portrayed the thorny bond entwining Dee Dee and Gypsy, a dynamic rendered with brutal clarity in The Act. There are shots of Dee Dee presiding over her double-door closet crammed with needless medications, many of them tranquilizers with “Sleepy Baby” scrawled over the label. But there are also sunny breakfast scenes, as mother and daughter absentmindedly hum “Three Blind Mice” in unison. When Dee Dee catches Gypsy eating a cupcake—she purportedly has a fatal sugar allergy—her terror registers as authentic, and perhaps, for less straightforward reasons, it is. Perhaps more than a study of true crime, the act is a show about the fierce attachment between mothers and daughters, gone horribly wrong.


Beginning with Dee Dee (Patricia Arquette) and Gypsy’s (Joey King) arrival in Springfield, Missouri, The Act tells a story of manipulation and claustrophobia. Having been left homeless by Hurricane Katrina, they now settle into a Candyland pink house built for them by Habitat for Humanity. Dee Dee would also use the story of the hurricane to perpetuate her fraud, claiming that Gypsy’s medical records had been lost in the floods. In Arquette’s performance, Dee Dee is a masterful and resourceful storyteller, who can repurpose any scrap of personal history for her own ends.

When the local press arrives to interview Dee Dee, it’s clear something is amiss. During the interview, Dee Dee, dominates the conversation and is quick to speak for her daughter. And when the reporter asks Gypsy if she is excited to make new friends, a telling squeeze from her mother’s hand—they are always holding hands—communicates to Gypsy her expectation: We have a script; stick to it. “Well, my mom is already my best friend,” Gypsy pipes up, sweetly, but with the practiced cadence of performance. King is especially adept at insinuating her character’s low simmering uneasiness, whether due to her mother’s pressure or the baffling experience of existing in her carefully-managed body. She remembers her mother once giving her a miniature house as a present, and promising her they would one day live in a house like that. With this pink house, now they do.

Yet Gypsy is not happy, something The Act reveals almost immediately. Dean has said she was most interested in depicting “that girl getting up at night and what she does in the dark.” And in fact, these are the scenes most crucial—and most heartbreaking—to the show, as we see a young woman struggling under the most deranged and oppressive circumstances. Puberty baffles Gypsy, because she has never been told to expect or to accept these intimate evolutions. She has been ordered to trust her mother when it comes to her health and her body.

When certain urges and questions arise, Dee Dee unceremoniously waves them away, emphasizing on Gypsy’s “eighteenth birthday”—by now she is actually in her twenties—that she will never be like other girls her age, but will instead remain her mother’s “little baby.” The first time we see Gypsy use a computer, she sneaks a few moments on her mother’s laptop while she is outside. Running a search for “best friends,” her lonely eyes tarry on stock photos of comely young women bathed in sunlight, taking selfies, laughing, and embracing: cheesy stuff, if you’re acquainted with the realities of companionship, but Gypsy is not. These photos, for her, belong to a fairy tale, a story that undermines the one Dee Dee has always told—that her mother is “already” her best friend, and, as such, other relationships are superfluous. She then googles “boyfriend kiss,” which yields more stock photos and signals to us that Gypsy’s sexuality is burgeoning, despite her mother’s attempts to squash it.

At one point, Dee Dee covers the windows with translucent contact paper, to conceal the goings-on of the house. Her mistake is to think the threat to the life she has constructed will come from outside. What she can’t prevent is her daughter’s desire to pull away from her, especially as she recognizes the extent to which Dee Dee has lied about her supposedly frail health. Gypsy’s teeth, long neglected, and rotting, are eventually removed at Dee Dee’s instruction—this is convenient, since age can be discerned through dental markings—and Gypsy, who only realizes what is happening just before she is put under anesthesia, is left bruised, gummy, and utterly dispirited. As she sobs quietly in the bath, her bowed head shaven—also at her mother’s insistence—Dee Dee takes palpable, maniacal solace in her daughter’s shattered will, relishing her crises as opportunities to perform a fantasy of motherhood.

Gypsy might not entirely comprehend Dee Dee’s plays for control, but as they years pass, she begins to resist them: She steals from her mother’s “nest egg”—all money collected under false pretenses from people who believed they were helping with Gypsy’s medical expenses—and buys phones and laptops. She meets Nick online, and the two begin a relationship shot through with BDSM that Gypsy only partially understands, and in which the boundaries between reality and fantasy are porous. When she finally asks Nick—or rather, Victor, his “dark personality”—to kill her mother, the exchange is filmed as an erotic fantasy with Gypsy donning a wig and dressed for cosplay. When she asks him—“Victor? Will you please kill my mother for me?”—she might as well be asking her big strong boyfriend to open a jar for her.

Reading about this case, I had wondered whether Gypsy could have taken different, less violent measures to secure her freedom. After all, she knew that she could walk—why not run outside and call for help? The Act anticipates this question, and offers a hypothesis. Certainly the abuse visited upon Gypsy involved psychological and physical isolation as much as it forced her to endure a pseudo-medical hellscape. Most everyone seems to believe Dee Dee, and when they don’t, Gypsy, understandably, squirms under a quivering sense of obligation. “My mom needs me,” she tells a doctor who hopes to unveil Dee Dee’s fraud.

It is a terrible truth. One day, after a fight in which Dee Dee smashes her computer, she pins her daughter to the bed and attempts to tie her up, before collapsing in hysterics. Gypsy wriggles away and heads to the front door, its yellow light glowing, promising. She has long known she possesses the physical strength to escape; perhaps, she finally possesses the will, too. But Dee Dee, by now struggling with Type Two Diabetes, calls from the bedroom, feeble and pathetic, begging Gypsy not to abandon her. What seems the easiest thing—walking out the door—is, in fact, the hardest.

The Atlantic Politics & Policy Daily: They Tried to Get a No on Veto

What We’re Following Today

It’s Tuesday, March 26.

‣ In a vote of 248–181, the House failed to reach the two-thirds majority required to override President Donald Trump’s veto of legislation that blocked his declaration of a national emergency.

‣ The Supreme Court heard challenges to two cases of partisan gerrymandering, one in Maryland and one in North Carolina.

‣ The Trump administration’s ban on bump stocks, devices that allow guns to fire bullets more quickly, went into effect today. Owners must either turn their bump stocks in to law enforcement or destroy them.

‣ Republicans in the Senate voted to block the Green New Deal from proceeding to a vote. All but three Democrats voted “present” in protest, arguing that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell only called the vote to divide the Democratic Party.

Senator Edward Markey speaks at a rally for the Green New Deal outside the Capitol. (Matthew Daly / AP)

Here’s what else we’re watching:

Losing the Narrative: The American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s annual policy conference, which ended today, underscored the strong and enthusiastic alliance between Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The speakers, both Democrat and Republican, maintained that the United States’ support for Israel is, as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi put it, “bipartisan and bicameral.” But that skates over the discomfort many American Jews feel about Trump and Netanyahu, reports Emma Green. “The American political conversation about Israel is shifting, in part because of backlash against America’s and Israel’s right-wing leaders.”

What Barr Left Out: There’s one part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation that Attorney General William Barr didn’t mention in his summary for Congress, Natasha Bertrand reports: his probe into counterintelligence operations.

Read Local: Americans don’t know it, but local news is dying. Seven in 10 Americans think their local news outlets are faring “very or somewhat well financially,” while only 14 percent of respondents said they pay for local news. The result, writes Alexis Madrigal, is that local news is disappearing, and civic journalism is eroding. “As the local journalistic institutions have fallen, they have not been replaced by something better, but rather nothing at all.”

#MeToo in Competitive College Speech: Peter Pober built up a reputation as a legendary competitive-speaking coach at George Mason University. But when several former students came forward to say that Pober had sexually harassed them, he was placed on administrative leave. Why did it take 15 years for the truth to win out?

Olivia Paschal and Madeleine Carlisle


Snapshot

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi speaks at the AIPAC policy conference. (Jose Luis Magana / AP)


Ideas From The Atlantic

Democrats Need to Learn From Their Al Franken Mistake (Emily Yoffe)
“As a society, we are in danger of losing a sense of proportion, and a belief in forgiveness. We lack established, fair procedures for evaluating claims of sexual violation outside the criminal-justice system. We need to slow down, be less certain, and think about how to weigh accusations in each case.” → Read on.

No One Who Matters Has Read the Mueller Report Yet (Quinta Jurecic)
“The problem is that Mueller’s report itself is not yet public. So while the matter at hand is definitively no longer one for the courts, members of Congress and the public at large—who will need to decide what is and is not acceptable in public life—don’t yet know the things they need to know in order to make an informed decision.” → Read on.

Liberal Societies Have Dangerously Low Birth Rates (Trent MacNamara)
“As demographic anxiety goes global and populist, a roiling debate is forming around basic questions: Why do some people want children, while others do not? Why do some societies seem to be shrinking? Can a progressive, reproductive-freedom-embracing society survive over time? Or is it doomed to a slow, comfortable death?”  → Read on.

Gerrymandering, or Geography? (Sam Wang)
“For a long time, the Supreme Court has limited racial gerrymanders, but it has been on the fence about the constitutionality of partisan gerrymanders, in part because there’s no universally agreed-upon way to measure them. As mathematical diagnostic tools improve, however, the Court might find it difficult to pretend that it has no choice but to do nothing.” → Read on.


What Else We’re Reading

Mike Pence Talked Dan Coats Out of Quitting the Trump Administration (Carol E. Lee and Courtney Kube, NBC News)
Obama Cautions Freshman House Democrats About the Price Tag of Liberal Policies (Rachael Bade, The Washington Post) (? Paywall)
The Christianization of U.S. Foreign Policy (Kathryn Joyce, The New Republic)
Abolishing the Electoral College Would Be a Mistake (Jonah Goldberg, The Record)

We’re always looking for ways to improve The Politics & Policy Daily. Comments, questions, typos, grievances and groans related to our puns? Let us know anytime here.

Were you forwarded this newsletter? Sign up for our daily politics email here. We have many other free email newsletters on a variety of other topics. Find the full list here.

Corporate Bullshit

Drawing by Nathaniel St. Clair

Business bullshit is about the meaningless language conjured up in schools, in banks, in consultancy firms, in politics, and in the media. This language drives thousands of business schools. It is this language that is handed down to MBAs. It releases MBAs happy to spread the managerial buzz-word language of business bullshit. When pro-business management academics, management writers, CEOs, and other upper level managers invent bullshit language, they fabricate something that gets in the way of businesses.

The historical origins of business bullshit and its pathological language came with Kroning and AT&T’s management guru, who was hired to change the AT&T corporation. According to Colvin’s Fortune Magazine obituary of Peter Drucker, Drucker once said a management guru is someone named so by people who can’t spell charlatan. In the case of AT&T’s business bullshit, it was the Russian mystic George Gurdjieff and his ideas that introduced an entire new set of bullshit language to management.

It might certainly be true that Kroning may have been killed off while Kronese has lived on. Management charlatans like Gurdjieff, even when changing just one company (AT&T), may have had an global impact. It contributed to managerial bullshit language. Bullshit language is part of an ideology that is used to legitimise and stabilize capitalism. Ideologies are not concerned with the truth. Instead, they are designed to eliminate contradictions and stabilize domination. Hence, the managerial bullshitter has a lack of connection or concern for the truth.

Needless to say, it is true that bullshitters are not concerned that their grand pronouncements might be illogical, unintelligible and downright baffling. All they care about is whether people will listen to them. Their jargon can become a linguistic barbed wire fence, which stops unfortunate amateurs from trespassing on territory already claimed by experts. Not surprisingly, one finds that many managerial practices are not adopted because they work, but because they are fashionable. And the bullshit merchant can find a lucrative trade in any large organization.

These are what anthropologist David Graeber called Bullshit Jobs. These are jobs in which people experience their work as utterly meaningless, contributing nothing to the world and they think should not exist. Those in managerial bullshit jobs use image enhancement had had one economic impact: the CEO’s pay went up. Even the otherwise extremely business friendly Fortune Magazine had to admit recently that the pay gap between average workers and CEOs stands at a whopping 271%.

As macro-level neoliberalism and micro-level Managerialism took hold, universities became marketing/ PR institutions with their presidents not yet called CEOs. Undeterred, they create what is calls a PR university. What is happening is the conversion of universities based on research and teaching into PR driven marketing institutions driven. The managerial PR university focuses on Fleck’s Impact Factor Fetishism. While MBAs learning and making use of business jargon, those on the receiving end of the Managerialism-speak merchants are coerced into what ultimately results in silence is the best policy. Meanwhile, workers under Managerialism are forced to adhere to an old feudal policy: when the great lord passes by, the wise peasant bows deeply and farts silently. Today, it is: when the great CEO passes by, the wise worker bows deeply and farts silently. All too often those at the receiving end of all this, i.e. workers are not just forgotten but deliberately eliminated from the public.

Aligned to this is the fact that despite the widespread stories about the decline of bureaucracy sclerosis, we have actually experienced an explosion of bureaucracy. We have seen an explosion of management mutating into Managerialism. When seeking to stabilize Managerialism, as is often done by business schools, their next task is to infuse new MBAs with the latest managerial buzzwords and weasel worlds. Set apart from corporate reality, it is not at all surprising to uncover that many management ideas are cooked up far away from the day-to-day realities of a workplace. Many management ideas are not designed to have much to do with the day-to-day realities of management. Far from workplace reality, business bullshit buzz words have a rather different task.

A notable example that seeks to achieve the task set out by ideology, is bosses continue to demand loyalty from their subordinates while those at the top get the lion’s share of rewards. Not surprisingly, bosses rake it in big time. Meanwhile Managerialism creates a huge number of bullshit jobs, such as PR agents and corporate lawyers. The central task of bullshit managers is to create a vast and apparently unbroken complex of rules and regulations, which increasingly infiltrate all of our lives. Meanwhile, rafts of business schools professors are ready to be the PR agents of corporations. Perhaps American writer and Pulitzer Prize winner, Upton Sinclair, hits the nail on the head when noting “it is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!”

Creating business bullshit and its language has never been the job of workers. It remains utterly the job of upper-level managers. Office workers are managerially controlled, supervised, monitored, watched, assessed and measured by KPIs, the infamous key performance indicators. It is not workers, but managers who are responsible for complex of rules and regulations. These govern us – those who need to work. And indeed, corporations, companies, business and even business schools love deregulation as it takes the state out of the equation. Taking out the regulative capacity of the state means opening up an unregulated space. This allows managers to re-regulate such spaces. As a consequence, we find incidents of macho-management. Just as the old saying goes: Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely.

More and more workers spend time answering emails, sitting in meetings and updating your LinkedIn profile they are also required to spend time trying to optimize the way workers process this bullshit. This acts as a double-edged sword for the workers in the form of bullshit time: 1) wasted time satisfying the upper echelons of Managerialism and 2) real working time, e.g. doing your job. Beyond that many workers complain about the stratospheric increase of sitting in often useless meetings. The sheer endless number of internet-transmitted jokes about meetings tells one as much.

Worse, some workers are annually forced into applying for their own jobs. In those cases, human resources (HR) management’s internal labor market is driven to extremes by upper-mangers. Being hooked on Managerialism often means being hooked on the systemic and structural casualization of the workforce often camouflaged as being part of strategic management and being flexible. Beyond that, it legitimizes upper management as they organize the entire recruitment and selection process from analyzing jobs, positioning job descriptions and advertising the position to creating short-lists and holding actual job interviews. More often than not, many of these activities are done to feed the management machine.

Many at the top of the managerial pyramid who believe in management fundamentalism see those at the bottom of Henry Fayol’s chain of command(1916) in the following way, you’re just a sheet of paper. This sheet of paper might appear to be business bullshit. However, management likes to condense workers’ contributions and working lives to a sheet of paper called balanced scorecard.Whether employees are denigrated to human resource assigned an individual profit indicting numbers on an (often not really) balancedscorecard or Excel file for the purpose of performance management, they are forced to toe the line. This is a line invented and handed out by upper management. More often than not, this occurs in a my way or the highway’ approach.

Being forced into the lockstep mode of management  means you can be cynical about management bullshit all you want in private, but in public you need to pretend you are signing up. These are authoritarian workplaces without democracy reflective of mixture of George Orwell’s Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-four. Managerialism mixes Orwellian-style some animals are more equal than others with Big Brother style workplace surveillance. Management critiques have labeled this Impression Management.

On a slightly more philosophical note, what this means might be reflective of French philosopher Baudrillard’s Simulacra. Many workers no longer really partake in management bullshit. Instead, they merely simulate signing up. Working in today’s companies becomes mere simulation. And this remains so irrespective of working with the corporate psychopath or not. Of course, it is not only ordinary office workers who are drowning in shit. It is the key theme of universities and business schools. As Don Watson once said “Managerialism came to universities as the German army came to Poland.”

One set of academic staff experienced these effects as plans for a new building for an international center for democracy and conflict resolution being cancelled in favor of a new building for the business school. The more we are made to believe that ‘we live in a democracy’, the more it seems it is taken away from us. Terms resembling workplace democracy and industrial democracy have been extinct. Google.Books suggests industrial democracy has become severely eroded since the 1970s. It has effectively been eliminated from the public domain and even more so from academia.

Industrial democracy is no longer taught at universities. In the managerialised university, teaching and research have been substituted by the classical insignia of Managerialism. Now it is university league tables, beauty contests, rankings and the aforementioned impact factor fetishism – the crown king of scholarly achievement. What counts in universities as in the business school itself is the routinely undergone brand-building and brand-refreshing exercises each time there is a change of Deans or a new cohort of management consultants being hired. This is an activity spiced up with the eternally performed treadmill of business restructuring.

In any university apparatus inflated by Managerialism, the number of administrators has increased rapidly while the number of academics has stays relatively flat. When the managerialist university is Selling Students Short it does so with more managers and fewer academics. Meanwhile, the real work is no longer doing research and teaching and other things a university is supposed to do. Rather, the real work has become dealing with bullshit to make universities appear more business-like.

Eccentrics and math genius, Alan Turing for example, may well be the people who told the truth but in today’s university their reputation is on the line and their jobs too. Today, university management will performance management you out of here if you do not measure up. The case of London’s Imperial College and Stefan Grimm has shown this. Business bullshit in the form of Managerialism has many more serious consequences, reaching far beyond mere lip service. Much of this has been so exquisitely described in Schrijvers’ The Way of the Rat. Interestingly, business bullshit terms such as corporate social responsibility (CSR) and business ethics are part management bullshit. Business bullshit has to do with power, capitalism, Managerialism and the ideology that legitimizes management.

Andre Spicer’s Bullshit Business is published by Routledge Press.

View More

You May Missed

Home Ethos About Contact
Terms Policy GDPR RichTVX
© Saeculum XXI U.S. Intelligence News